Comparative characteristics of microcrystalline cellulose obtained from the rice waste production of Kazakhstan

  • Ainur Battalova S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan; Scientific Center of Composite Materials, Almaty, Kazakhstan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0002-5665
  • Zhanar Ibraeva Scientific Center of Composite Materials, Almaty, Kazakhstan; Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Sana Kabdrakhmanova Satbayev University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Kydyrmolla Akatan S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
  • Esbol Shaimardan Scientific Center of Composite Materials, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Ansagan Demeukhan S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
  • Altynai Tursyngazykyzy S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
  • Madiar Beisebekov Scientific Center of Composite Materials, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Aida Maussumbayeva I. Zhansugurov Zhetysu University, Taldykorgan, Kazakhstan
Keywords: rice husks (RH), organosolvent oxidation, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), FTIR, crystal structure

Abstract

Development of methods for effective processing of reconstructive biological resources and allocation of valuable materials refers to the main tasks of science and industry. The work determines the optimal hydro module and physico-chemical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), obtained by the method of organosolvent oxidation of rice husk (RH), grown in the southern (Kyzylorda region) and southeast (Almaty region) of Kazakhstan, and it was established that the yield and the qualitative indicators of the MCC depends on the climatic and geographical features of the region, where raw materials are grown to obtain cellulose. The effective hydro module for MCC obtained from Bakanas rice husk (B-RH) was found to be 1:12 g/mL and yield was 45.0%, whereas Kyzylorda rice husk (K-RH) the effective hydromodule was 1:10 g/mL and yield found to be equal to 52.58%. During organosolvent oxidation, the selected method did not require additional processing of raw materials. It was discovered that for delignification, it takes 120 minutes of time, and the yield of MCC will be 15-18% higher than the cellulose obtained by the alkali. Rice husk is a promising alternative raw material for cellulose production and the use of the organosolvent method for obtaining an MCC is an economically advantageous and environmentally friendly method.

References

1 Nakamura Y, Ono Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2019) Cellulose 26:6529–6541. Crossref

2 Arun V, Perumal EM, Prakash KA, Rajesh M, Tamilarasan K (2020) J Environ Chem Eng 8:104124. Crossref

3 K. Shukla S, C. Dubey;Ashutosh Tiwari G, Bharadvaja A (2013) Adv Mater Lett 4:714–719. Crossref

4 Saprykina LV (1990) Khimiya drevesiny 6:3-7. (In Russian)

5 Das AM, Ali AA, Hazarika MP (2014) Carbohydr Polym 112:342–349. Crossref

6 Islam MdS, Kao N, Bhattacharya SN, Gupta R, Bhattacharjee PK (2017) J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 80:820–834. Crossref

7 Megbenu H, Azhikhanova Z, Ingkar G, Rakhimgaliyev N, Mels A, Kenzheshov A, et al. (2024) Eurasian Journal of Chemistry 29:96–105. Crossref

8 Yunus MA (2019) Jurnal Akta Kimia Indonesia (Indonesia Chimica Acta) 12:79. Crossref

9 (2023) Rice fields and production decreased in Kazakhstan [Qazaqstanda küriş alqabı men öndirisi azaydı]. Web-source: URL . (Published 06 May 2023) (In Kazakh)

10 (2020) Utilizes rice waste [Küriş qaldığın kädege jaratadı] Web-source: URL . (Published 21 October 2020) (In Kazakh)

11 Hayatun A, Jannah M, Ahmad A, Taba P (2020) J Phys Conf Ser 1463:012009. Crossref

12 Collazo-Bigliardi S, Ortega-Toro R, Chiralt Boix A (2018) Carbohydr Polym 191:205–215. Crossref

13 ANDALIA R, RAHMI R, JULINAWATI J, HELWATI H (2020) Jurnal Natural 20:6–9. Crossref

14 Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A (2012) Ind Crops Prod 37:93–99. Crossref

15 Marin DC, Vecchio A, Ludueña LN, Fasce D, Alvarez VA, Stefani PM (2015) Fibers and Polymers 16:285–293. Crossref

16 Ahmad Z, Roziaizan NN, Rahman R, Mohamad AF, Wan Ismail WIN (2016) MATEC Web of Conferences 47:05013. Crossref

17 Akatan K, Kabdrakhmanova S, Kuanyshbekov T, Ibraeva Z, Battalova A, Joshy KS, et al. (2022) Cellulose 29:3787–3802. Crossref

18 Battalova AK, Kabdrakhmanova SK, Akatan K, Beisebekov MM, Kantay N, Ibraeva ZhE, et al. (2023) International Journal of Biology and Chemistry 16:78–86. Crossref

19 Freitas PAV, González-Martínez C, Chiralt A (2023) Carbohydr Polym 312:120805. Crossref

20 Sharma N, Allardyce BJ, Rajkhowa R, Agrawal R (2023) Sci Rep 13:16327. Crossref

21 Nzereogu PU, Omah AD, Ezema FI, Iwuoha EI, Nwanya AC (2023) Hybrid Advances 4:100111. Crossref

22 Nasir A, Adrus N, Bohari SPM (2022) Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 56:911–928. Crossref

23 Samsalee N, Meerasri J, Sothornvit R (2023) Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications 6:100353. Crossref

24 Onoja DA, Ahemen I, Iorfa TF (2019) J Appl Phys 11:80-87. Crossref

25 Morcali MH, Zeytuncu B, Yucel O (2013) Materials Research 16:528–538. Crossref

26 Lazzari LK, Zimmermann MVG, Perondi D, Zampieri VB, Zattera AJ, Santana RMC (2019)Materials Research. Crossref

27 Saleh ME, El-Refaey AA, Mahmoud AH (2016) Soil and Water Research 11:53–63. Crossref

28 Cao Y, Tan H (2004) J Mol Struct 705:189–193. Crossref

29 Zghari B, Hajji L, Boukir A (2018) J Mater Environ Sci 9(2):641-654. Crossref

30 Kian LK, Jawaid M, Ariffin H, Alothman OY (2017) Int J Biol Macromol 103:931–940. Crossref

31 Haafiz MKM, Hassan A, Zakaria Z, Inuwa IM (2014) Carbohydr Polym 103:119–125. Crossref

32 Trifol J, Sillard C, Plackett D, Szabo P, Bras J, Daugaard AE (2017) Cellulose 24:107–118. Crossref

33 Kačuráková M, Smith AC, Gidley MJ, Wilson RH (2002) Carbohydr Res 337:1145–1153. Crossref

34 Cichosz S, Masek A (2020) Materials 13:4573. Crossref

35 French AD (2014) Cellulose 21:885–896. Crossref

36 Podgorbunskikh EM, Bychkov AL, Bulina N V., Lomovskii OI (2018) Journal of Structural Chemistry 59:201–208. Crossref

37 Yussuf AA, Massoumi I, Hassan A (2010) J Polym Environ 18:422–429. Crossref
Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
Battalova, A., Ibraeva, Z., Kabdrakhmanova, S., Akatan, K., Shaimardan, E., Demeukhan, A., Tursyngazykyzy, A., Beisebekov, M., & Maussumbayeva, A. (2024). Comparative characteristics of microcrystalline cellulose obtained from the rice waste production of Kazakhstan. Chemical Bulletin of Kazakh National University, 113(4), In press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15328/cb1386