Evaluation of the effectiveness of the filtration leaching for uranium recovery from uranium ore
Abstract
The physical and chemical processes taking place in filtration leaching of uranium from uranium ore sample by sulphuric acid solution have been studied by modern physico-chemical methods (X-ray diffraction, scanning electron spectroscopy, electron probe microanalysis, optical emission spectroscope, ICP OES). Column leaching test was carried out for ore samples obtained from a uranium in-situ leaching (ISL) mining site using deluted sulphuricacid to study the evolution of various elements concentration in the pregnant leach solution. It has been shown that the uranium in pregnant solutions appears by dissolution of calcium and magnesium carbonates and uranium minerals as well. It was found the decreasing of filtration coefficient from 0.099 m day-1 to 0.082 m day-1, due to the presence of mechanical and chemical mudding. Partial extraction of uranium (85%) from the ore has been explained by the slow diffusion of sulfuric acid to the uranium minerals locates in the cracks of silicate minerals. It was concluded that the studied uranium ore sample according to adverse geotechnical parameters is not suitable for uranium extraction by filtration leaching.
References
1 Benes V, Boitsov AV, Fuzlullin M, et al. (2001) Manual of acid in situ leach uranium mining technology. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. P.294.
2 Satybaldiyev B, Lehto J, Suksi J, et al. (2015) Hydrometallurgy 155:125-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.04.017
3 Mamilov VA, Petrov RP, Novik-Kachan VP (1980) Uranium mining by in-situ leaching technology [Dobyicha urana metodom podzemnogo vyischelachivaniya]. Atomizdat, Almaty, Kazakhstan (In Russian)
4 Brovin KG, Grabovnikov VA, Shumilin MV, Yazikov VG (1997) Prediction, prospecting, exploration and commercial evaluation of uranium deposits for in-situ leaching [Prognoz, poiski, razvedka i promyishlennaya otsenka mestorozhdeniy urana dlya otrabotki podzemnyim vyischelachivaniem]. Gyilyim, Almaty, Kazakhstan. ISBN: 5-628-02175-X (In Russian)
5 Ding DX, Fu HY, Ye YJ, et al. (2013) Hydrometallurgy 136: 85-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.03.009
6 Beletskiy VI, Bogatkov LK, Volkov NI, Skorovarov DI (1997) Handbook on uranium geotechnology [Spravochnik po geotehnologii urana]. Energoatomizdat, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian). ISBN 5-283-02917-4
7 Reeder RJ, Nugent M, Tait CD (2001) Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65: 3491-3503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00647-0
8 Lottering MJ, Lorenzen L, Phala NS, et al. (2008) Minerals Engineering 21: 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2007.06.006
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.