Effect of peroxodisulfate on uranium leaching with ammonium bicarbonate

  • Nurbek Nurpeisov аl-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Yuliya Marchuk аl-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • B. Satybaldiyev аl-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Bolat Uralbekov аl-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Mukhambetkali Burkitbayev аl-Farabi Kazakh National University
Keywords: Uranium leaching, ammonium bicarbonate, sulphuric acid, in-situ methods, agitation leaching, dynamic leaching

Abstract

In this study, uranium leaching from ore material using acid solution and bicarbonate in a presence peroxodisulfate ion was examined. For experiments two different tips of leaching methods were used: leaching in static and dynamic conditions. The determination of uranium concentrations in product solutions were analyzed by titrimetric (by ammonia vanadate solution) method. The maximum yield of uranium leached with ammonium bicarbonate in a presence of ammonium peroxodisulfate (5 g/L) was only 33%, which is half the corresponding value obtained by sulfuric acid (65%).

References

1. Pat. USA № US 2012/0125158 A1; pub number 13/302;232; pub date 24.05.2012

2. Pat. USA № 3180703; pub date 27.04.1965 Pat. USA № 2900229; pub date 18.08.1959

3. Brovin K.G.; Grabnikov V.A.;Shumilin M.V.;Yazikov V.G. Forecast; search; exploration and commercial evaluation of uranium mining to underground leaching.– Almaty: Gylym; 1997 (in Russian). – 374 p.

4. Skorovarov D.I. Reference geotechnology uranium. –M. Energoatomizdat; 1997 (in Russian). 672 p.

5. www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf89.html

6. Paul M. Bommer; Robert S. Schechter. Mathematical Modeling of In-Situ Uranium Leaching // Society of petroleum engineers journal. – 1979.–Vol.19; №7.– p. 393-400.

Published
2013-05-14
How to Cite
Nurpeisov, N., Marchuk, Y., Satybaldiyev, B., Uralbekov, B., & Burkitbayev, M. (2013). Effect of peroxodisulfate on uranium leaching with ammonium bicarbonate. Chemical Bulletin of Kazakh National University, 69(1), 59-63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15328/chemb_2013_159-63